SBC Break Failure

FOLLOWING POINTS NEED ANSWERS:

• Why was SBC braking replaced immediately and never repeated on any new model. Reading the pre launch details it should have become the new standard based on high claims of Daimler AG.
• Parameterisation( changing of earlier parameters) was used for years to reprogram SBC control units in the field secretly through add-on patches. This was done to delay the incidence of automatic switching to hydraulic mode. This also failed.
• A counter equivalent to a “suicide counter” is secretly maintained in every car behind the backs of customers and safety regulators. This is information critical to customer’s lives yet many customers do not wish to visit dealers of Daimler AG/Mercedes Benz as per their rights. How are they informed of this defect?
• As of now only threats of cancellation of warranty or in case of old cars, free offers, are used top trap/lure customers into visiting dealers only, instead of private workshops. However for those customers remaining outside the dealer workshop how can the life expectancy of the SBC braking unit be known to have been crossed till the random occurrence of failure.
• There is no braking system in the world which has such a weakness that when it wears-out there is an immediate and total failure of brakes. Proof exists that the “life” of the unit varies from days to years as we have demonstrated on our own car. How has Daimler AG refused to inform the users of affected cars worldwide of the time-bombs they are driving?
• In the hope that most cars will some how visit the dealer, where the SBC unit’s “service life” will be checked and the unit will be replaced if necessary, EVERY CUSTOMERS LIFE has been put in severe danger. The companies hope seems to be that most failures can be prevented by the series of measures including reprogramming the parameters which caused the brake to switch to the useless “hydraulic mode” and that in this way the recall of such an embarrassing defect could be avoided for years. In this process a lesser number of customers may die when their brakes fail and those can be tackled individually since any way no outsider can access proof like the “service life counter” or the Freeze frame data of the failure occurrence. The self diagnosis system is already set to remove all warning lights.
• By removing this “ground braking technology” from further new models Daimler AG hopes to let all cars with SBC become scrap yet they have missed out the fact that all second hand cars become too unviable to service at authorised workshops and the customers buying a used Mercedes for the first time are buying coffins which will not receive the necessary “SECRET TREATMENT”. We have hard evidence of cars which have had actual failures not having SBC units replaced because the failure does not re-occur for enormous periods and there is no permanent driver warning. On hearing the cost of SBC units customers refuse to replace them and since the whole issue is secret there is no official documentation to convince them of the risk.
• Today countless people are driving these ten year old cars unaware of the above information and dealers are also totally in the dark, acting in random fashion based on available information.
  This is another criminal conspiracy for which regulators worldwide have failed in their duty. According to norms of morality the persons who have extended the risk of death of customers knowingly by following the above policies instead of an open recall are guilty of attempted murder of countless unsuspecting customers.